Cumbrian building firms warned over VAT sting
Last updated at 16:57, Thursday, 05 April 2012
Construction firms who work on listed buildings are being warned of a new pasty-style VAT sting.
From October, the Government is removing the VAT exemption on alterations to listed buildings.
The move was revealed in Chancellor George Osborne’s Budget alongside the removal of VAT exemptions for hot food takeaway food like pies and pasties.
Dodd & Co, the Carlisle chartered accountancy, is warning builders of the new rules.
A statement read: “The press jumped on the pasty VAT change, but there is another change which will affect the construction industry. The Chancellor plans to remove the VAT exemption for alterations to listed buildings from October 1.
“If you have a job on a listed building where the contract had been signed before March 21, the day of the Budget, the exemption could be honoured.
“But if you have a listed building job, but no signed contract, it is worth getting it pushed through and billed by October 1 to keep the cost to the customer down.”
First published at 14:22, Thursday, 05 April 2012
Published by http://www.cumberlandnews.co.uk
Have your say
- Couple reveal plans to restore village pub to its former glory
- No special plans to deal with Hartlepool's Paynter, says Carlisle Utd boss
- Former Appleby bank turned into deli and butchers
- Family's appeal for help to adapt house for disabled daughter
- £2.25m revamp of Carlisle industrial estate to start
- From Carlisle airport to New York for just £200? (23 comments)
- Farmfoods given consent for supermarket at Carlisle's Shaddongate (23 comments)
- Cumbria Pride crisis as Carlisle LGBT centre to close (52 comments)
- £6m primary school planned for Carlisle (18 comments)
- German firm unveils plans for huge solar park near Carlisle (4 comments)
- Residents want action over Silloth’s ‘nauseating’ pong (9 comments)
- Call for action after crash at accident 'blackspot' near Carlisle (29 comments)
- Carlisle's Labour Party backs Jeremy Corbyn leadership bid (32 comments)